Informed Refusal: A Review

August 17, 2021

Reading time: 5 minutes

Informed refusal, like informed consent, is a concept that relies on ethical and legal guidelines that acknowledge the right of competent adults to determine the course of their healthcare. Also, like informed consent, informed refusal refers to a process that requires consultation between a healthcare provider and a patient to determine viable treatment options and engage the patient in treatment-related decisions.

As a healthcare provider, effective communication and thorough patient education are your best allies for encouraging patient collaboration and gaining patient cooperation in selecting and adhering to a treatment plan.

However, patients can refuse care even if the consequences might be dire. Patients also have the right to change their minds and withdraw consent for treatment they have previously authorized, even when the treatment has been started.

Risk Considerations

When a patient refuses treatment or wants to abandon a treatment plan, you should consider the following questions:

  • Was the patient given adequate information about his/her diagnosis as well as treatment options that meet the current standard of care?
  • Did you thoroughly discuss with the patient the risks and benefits of treatment options?
  • Did you and the patient discuss and agree upon mutual expectations for a satisfactory outcome?
  • Did you encourage the patient to ask questions and voice concerns? Were these questions and concerns addressed to the patient’s satisfaction?
  • Did you explain the risks associated with refusing treatment? Risks might include:
    • Fewer treatment options as the condition deteriorates.
    • Lower probability of a successful or optimal outcome.
    • Higher probability of complications.
    • Remaining treatment options that are more expensive than the treatment that was initially recommended.
  • Did you ask for the patient’s reason for the decision? If you are aware of the patient’s reason for refusal, you might be able to propose an alternative treatment option that the patient will accept.

These examples illustrate the figurative seesaw that the healthcare community has experienced with EHR technology. As a result, feelings about EHRs often are mixed, and many providers cite EHR issues as a key contributor to clinician burnout.

In addition to clinical and operational issues, EHRs also have introduced a new dynamic in malpractice liability. A survey from the Medical Professional Liability (MPL) Association (formerly PIAA) found that more than half of member companies had EHR-related malpractice litigation.2 Major contributing factors in this litigation included problems with documentation, system functionality, metadata, record format, vendor support, and more. Further, a review of malpractice claims facilitated by CRICO Strategies showed that claims involving EHR factors were costly and almost half resulted in high-severity outcomes (i.e., permanent disability or death).3

This article focuses on a number of areas in which EHR-related risks may occur due to time constraints, inexperience, oversight, system usability, or other factors. Risk strategies also are presented for each area covered, with the hope that they will lay the groundwork for more thorough discussions within healthcare organizations about how to manage risks associated with complex EHR systems.


If the patient has received adequate information and education, but still refuses treatment, you should scrupulously document the decision in the patient’s health record. Documentation should include the patient’s diagnosis, the recommended treatment, the outcomes that might occur if the condition isn’t treated, and all patient education efforts.
If you opt to use an informed refusal form, give the patient a copy of the signed form and retain the original in the patient’s health record. The form should include:

  • The patient’s diagnosis
  • Treatment options and the treatment plan the patient elected (if any), as well as risks and benefits associated with each
  • Acknowledgement that the patient refused or terminated treatment
  • Specific risks that might occur if the patient doesn’t receive care, and acceptance of the risk on the part of the patient
  • The patient’s signature (if he/she agrees to sign)

Although it is not always necessary for the patient to sign an informed refusal form, the request forces the patient to acknowledge the seriousness of the untreated condition. Many patients will sign the form, but some refuse. In the event of refusal, you should document that the patient was asked to sign the form and would not do so.

Some providers like to have a witness present when a patient refuses needed care. When an employee has been asked to witness the informed refusal process, he/she should sign the record and date the signature — regardless of whether the patient agrees to sign.

Ongoing Care

By refusing urgently needed care, patients might increase their risk of injuries and possibly increase your liability risk. Under these circumstances, you might (a) continue to see and treat such patients with the hope that they might change their mind or that, if their conditions deteriorate, emergent care can still be initiated, or (b) feel that you have no other choice but to formally withdrawal from these patients’ care.

If you decide to withdraw from a patient’s care because of a treatment refusal, a discussion should take place, if possible, before the formal discharge process occurs. The patient should know that you feels strongly enough about the recommended treatment that you might withdraw rather than stand by as a witness to the deterioration of the patient’s condition.

Having decided to withdraw, you should formalize the notification with a discharge letter, giving the patient adequate time (generally 30 days) to find another practitioner. The letter should be sent to the patient via certified mail with return receipt requested, and an additional copy should be sent through first class mail. Copies of the letter should be maintained in the patient’s file.

For more information, see MedPro’s guideline titled Terminating a Provider—Patient Relationship.

In Summary

When patients refuse necessary care, healthcare providers must be vigilant in ensuring that the patients understand the potential risks and consequences of their decisions. Providers also should make sure all informed refusal processes are thoroughly documented in patients’ health records, including any related forms or documents. When in doubt about how to handle a patient’s refusal of treatment or withdraw from a treatment plan, contact a risk management expert.

Additional Risk content


Discharging a disgruntled or dissatisfied patient from clinical practice is a delicate process that requires careful consideration of the patient’s…


In the past two decades, social media has become ubiquitous in the United States and abroad. The widespread proliferation of…


Risk Checklist Documentation Essentials Documentation serves many purposes, from patient care record keeping, to communications, to coding and billing, and…

This document should not be construed as medical or legal advice and should not be construed as rules or establishing a standard of care. Because the facts applicable to your situation may vary, or the laws applicable in your jurisdiction may differ, please contact your attorney or other professional advisors if you have any questions related to your legal or medical obligations or rights, state or federal laws, contract interpretation, or other legal questions.

MedPro Group is the marketing name used to refer to the insurance operations of The Medical Protective Company, Princeton Insurance Company, PLICO, Inc. and MedPro RRG Risk Retention Group. All insurance products are underwritten and administered by these and other Berkshire Hathaway affiliates, including National Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Product availability is based upon business and/or regulatory approval and/or may differ among companies.

© MedPro Group Inc. All rights reserved.